The documents within this repository are likely to be a mix of external and internally generated papers covering a similarly diverse subject range as detailed in the Aims section, which contains proposed outline policies and contributions from participants, some of whom have a specialist knowledge or interests.
All documents are fact checked and verified against the current laws of science before being accepted as baseline reference material, as such challenges of accuracy can be replicated at any time thereafter as deemed appropriate.
It is probably easier to detail what should not find its’ way into the reference library; e.g. opinion, speculation, propaganda, myths and conjecture; to name a few of the most obvious categories of any sort or flavour.
If you (the reader) identify a variance from these criteria, please let us know.
We are evaluating the possibility of a more generic section for documents with an interest value which do not comply with the reference library criteria and would welcome reader contributions to the discussion.